Hi,
It looks like I missed this. Sorry.
On Wed, 2021-05-26 at 19:34 +0300, Petr Ovtchenkov wrote:
> On Wed, 26 May 2021 12:41:51 -0300
> Érico Nogueira wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes, we really cross.
>
> It doesn't matter because
>
> > We always use the release tarballs, which already have the %_dis.
On Wed, 26 May 2021 12:41:51 -0300
Érico Nogueira wrote:
>
> Yes, we really cross.
It doesn't matter because
> We always use the release tarballs, which already have the %_dis.h
> files. This explains why we haven't hit any issues.
> Anyway, couldn't you (re)use the distribution tarball gene
On Wed May 26, 2021 at 10:58 AM -03, Petr Ovtchenkov wrote:
> On Wed, 26 May 2021 10:09:31 -0300
> Érico Nogueira wrote:
>
> > Hi! Are you sure this is necessary? In Void Linux, we cross compile
> > elfutils for arm and aarch64 without any issue, and I have built it a
> > few times for powerpc as
On Wed, 26 May 2021 10:09:31 -0300
Érico Nogueira wrote:
> Hi! Are you sure this is necessary? In Void Linux, we cross compile
> elfutils for arm and aarch64 without any issue, and I have built it a
> few times for powerpc as well.
>
Hello!
Yes, I am sure. I do not know about you process (chec
Hi! Are you sure this is necessary? In Void Linux, we cross compile
elfutils for arm and aarch64 without any issue, and I have built it a
few times for powerpc as well.
On Wed May 26, 2021 at 4:32 AM -03, Petr Ovtchenkov wrote:
> Possible problem with out-of-tree build expected
> ---
> Makefile.am
Possible problem with out-of-tree build expected
---
Makefile.am | 2 +-
configure.ac | 6 ++
lib-host/Makefile.am | 47
libcpu/Makefile.am | 11 +++
4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 l
