On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 04:30:14PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Also found by afl-fuzz on the varlocs testcase.
> DW_FORM_data16 is constant from according to the DWARF5 spec.
> But since it is 128bits it isn't really representable as Dwarf_Word.
> So we treat it as block form. But we cannot treat
Also found by afl-fuzz on the varlocs testcase.
DW_FORM_data16 is constant from according to the DWARF5 spec.
But since it is 128bits it isn't really representable as Dwarf_Word.
So we treat it as block form. But we cannot treat it as an expression
block. Make sure readelf prints it as a regular bl
