Hi Mark,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:53:48PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:44:05AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > This is nice, thanks.
> > I have one question about the patch:
> >
> > [...]
> > > --- a/src/elflint.c
> > > +++ b/src/elflint.c
> > > @@
Hi Dmitry,
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:44:05AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> This is nice, thanks.
> I have one question about the patch:
>
> [...]
> > --- a/src/elflint.c
> > +++ b/src/elflint.c
> > @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ section [%2d] '%s': XINDEX for zeroth entry not
> > zero\n"),
> > con
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 09:52:40PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Adding the symbol name associated with the symbol index number
> makes the error messages a little bit more useful. We used to say:
>
> section [59] '.symtab': symbol 9: st_value out of bounds
>
> But now says:
>
> section [59] '.s
Adding the symbol name associated with the symbol index number
makes the error messages a little bit more useful. We used to say:
section [59] '.symtab': symbol 9: st_value out of bounds
But now says:
section [59] '.symtab': symbol 9 (.annobin_size.c.hot): st_value out of bounds
Signed-off-by:
