On 3/2/24 21:05, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Martin,
[...]
It would be interesting to see the perf tool patch. I don't understand
the use case. So I assume perf currently does something which is wrong
and with your patch calling this new dwfl_set_offline_next_addres it
will do the right thing. That
Hi Martin,
On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 07:43:38PM -0300, Martin Rodriguez Reboredo wrote:
> On 3/2/24 17:47, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:04:05PM -0300, Martin Rodriguez Reboredo wrote:
> >>Added a new function dwfl_set_offline_next_addres which will set said
> >>field from the D
Oh hi Mark!
On 3/2/24 17:47, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Martin,
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:04:05PM -0300, Martin Rodriguez Reboredo wrote:
Added a new function dwfl_set_offline_next_addres which will set said
field from the Dwfl struct. This is a requirement for listing functions
from their addre
Hi Martin,
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:04:05PM -0300, Martin Rodriguez Reboredo wrote:
> Added a new function dwfl_set_offline_next_addres which will set said
> field from the Dwfl struct. This is a requirement for listing functions
> from their addresses when using libdwfl offline, otherwise wrong
Added a new function dwfl_set_offline_next_addres which will set said
field from the Dwfl struct. This is a requirement for listing functions
from their addresses when using libdwfl offline, otherwise wrong symbols
are going to be returned.
Signed-off-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo
---
libdwfl/li
