On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 17:06 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> This just makes sure we know how the new forms are encoded.
> It doesn't yet handle them in the dwarf_form* functions.
> But it does make it possible to skip them when reading DWARF5.
>
> DW_FORM_implicit_const has zero size (the value is i
This just makes sure we know how the new forms are encoded.
It doesn't yet handle them in the dwarf_form* functions.
But it does make it possible to skip them when reading DWARF5.
DW_FORM_implicit_const has zero size (the value is in the abbrev,
not in the info). DW_FORM_addrx[1234], DW_FORM_strx[
