On 3/24/24 14:08, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Martin,
On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 11:11:21AM -0300, Martin Rodriguez Reboredo wrote:
[...]
So this patch is kinda pointless, but at least I've managed to learn
what I was missing. Anyways, thanks for the heads-up. :)
I don't think it was pointless. Clea
Hi Martin,
On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 11:11:21AM -0300, Martin Rodriguez Reboredo wrote:
> On 3/20/24 19:52, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >Could you show an example of when/where you need it and what address
> >you set it to?
>
> For example, this test program reports the name and location pointed by
> th
On 3/20/24 19:52, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 04:22:49PM -0300, Martin Rodriguez Reboredo wrote:
Added new functions dwfl_get_offline_next_address and
dwfl_set_offline_next_address which will get plus set said field from
the Dwfl struct. This is a requirement for lis
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 04:22:49PM -0300, Martin Rodriguez Reboredo wrote:
> Added new functions dwfl_get_offline_next_address and
> dwfl_set_offline_next_address which will get plus set said field from
> the Dwfl struct. This is a requirement for listing functions from their
> addresse
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 2:23 PM Martin Rodriguez Reboredo
wrote:
>
> diff --git a/tests/dwfl-offline-address.c b/tests/dwfl-offline-address.c
> new file mode 100644
> index ..9a33b95a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/dwfl-offline-address.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> +#include
> +#includ
Added new functions dwfl_get_offline_next_address and
dwfl_set_offline_next_address which will get plus set said field from
the Dwfl struct. This is a requirement for listing functions from their
addresses when using libdwfl offline, otherwise wrong symbols are going
to be returned.
Signed-off-by:
