On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:24:46AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> I reviewed and approved both of these commits assuming that they brought
> no regressions. If sys/ptrace.h from glibc 2.25 could be included before
> or after linux/ptrace.h, this shouldn't have changed in glibc 2.26.
>
> In other
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 06:41:47PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 19:29 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:44:54PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > glibc 2.26 changed the sys/ptrace.h header so that it cannot be included
> > > after asm/ptrace.h. We s
On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 19:29 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:44:54PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > glibc 2.26 changed the sys/ptrace.h header so that it cannot be included
> > after asm/ptrace.h. We still need to include the kernel asm/ptrace.h for
> > the ptrace_area de
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:44:54PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> glibc 2.26 changed the sys/ptrace.h header so that it cannot be included
> after asm/ptrace.h. We still need to include the kernel asm/ptrace.h for
> the ptrace_area definition. Including it after sys/ptrace.h works against
> both old
glibc 2.26 changed the sys/ptrace.h header so that it cannot be included
after asm/ptrace.h. We still need to include the kernel asm/ptrace.h for
the ptrace_area definition. Including it after sys/ptrace.h works against
both old and new glibc.
Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard
---
backends/ChangeLog
