https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24509
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24509
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from Mark Wie
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24509
--- Comment #5 from Tom Tromey ---
FWIW the output looks reasonable to me now. Thanks for doing this!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24509
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #11760|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24509
--- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey ---
To check for negative values, I think you can add another
clause, here's what I did:
package Rng is
type Rec (I : Integer) is record
case I is
when Positive =>
C : Character;
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24509
--- Comment #2 from Tom Tromey ---
Here's one that uses both ranges and discrete elements:
package Rng is
type Rec (I : Integer) is record
case I is
when Positive =>
C : Character;
case I is
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24509
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
