https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
Martin Liska changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liska ---
Created attachment 11257
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11257&action=edit
openSUSE build log
I'm attaching my build log. In general, I guess following flags are used:
-std=gnu99 -
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
It does seem to work correctly on Fedora 29 with gcc 8.2, binutils 2.31 and
glibc 2.28:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/elfutils/0.174/1.fc29/data/logs/s390x/build.log
PASS: run-backtrace-d
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liska ---
$ ld --version
GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE:Factory:zSystems) 2.31
$ /lib64/libc.so.6
GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.28 (git 3c03baca37fd).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
--- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard ---
Note that we have an s390x fedora buildbot worker that also uses GCC 8.1.1:
https://builder.wildebeest.org/buildbot/#/workers/5
That one is green.
So I suspect it is either a different binutils or glibc (
