https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26921
--- Comment #10 from Mark Wielaard ---
https://inbox.sourceware.org/elfutils-devel/CAK-+vz0guN1=d5-ecurtqaf0znl+agyfg4n7pguumkwniom...@mail.gmail.com/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26921
--- Comment #9 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Ben Woodard from comment #8)
> One thing that I’m unclear about is how these two are different.
> It doesn’t matter to me that they are split up but I just don’t understand
> why?
Simply so t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26921
--- Comment #8 from Ben Woodard ---
One thing that I’m unclear about is how these two are different.
It doesn’t matter to me that they are split up but I just don’t understand
why?
-ben
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 2:00 PM mark at klomp dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26921
--- Comment #7 from Mark Wielaard ---
Thanks for the backtraces, they show a different concurrent unsafe thing in
libdw, the usage of (lazy) tsearch caches. I opened a separate bug for that,
bug #26930
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26921
--- Comment #6 from Ben Woodard ---
Created attachment 12986
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12986&action=edit
a unique one at tsearch.c:229
This one particular crash is unique in that it does NOT contain
__libdw_inter
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26921
--- Comment #5 from Ben Woodard ---
There were 214 crashes in my test that ended up in tseach.c those 4 back traces
represent the 4 places where the problem occured.
tsearch.c:229 - 181 cases
tsearch.c:269 - 16 cases
tsearch.c:214 - 13 cases
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26921
--- Comment #4 from Ben Woodard ---
Created attachment 12985
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12985&action=edit
example backtrace tsearch.c:214
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26921
--- Comment #3 from Ben Woodard ---
Created attachment 12984
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12984&action=edit
example backtrace tsearch.c:269
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26921
--- Comment #2 from Ben Woodard ---
Created attachment 12983
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12983&action=edit
example backtrace tsearch.c:229
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26921
Ben Woodard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||woodard at redhat dot com
--- Comment #
10 matches
Mail list logo
