[Bug debuginfod/30221] Negative cache should differentiate failure types

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30221 Frank Ch. Eigler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debuginfod/30221] Negative cache should differentiate failure types

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30221 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mark at klomp dot org --- Comment #13

[Bug debuginfod/30221] Negative cache should differentiate failure types

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30221 --- Comment #12 from Frank Ch. Eigler --- There was a wild performance regression in sqlite 3.41 that archlinux's debuginfod server got hit with. This was identified and corrected yesterday. (It had nothing to do with caching.) https://sqli

[Bug debuginfod/30221] Negative cache should differentiate failure types

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30221 --- Comment #11 from Vicki Pfau --- I am using 11.1, but I think part of the problem is that Arch adopted debuginfod relatively recently and hasn't backfilled packages. I updated my packages yesterday and it took forever to start gdb today, bu

[Bug debuginfod/30221] Negative cache should differentiate failure types

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30221 --- Comment #10 from Aaron Merey --- (In reply to Vicki Pfau from comment #7) > The issue appears to be the debuginfod server taking a not-insignificant > amount of time per request (500ms - 2s I'd estimate) to report the absence > of an assoc

[Bug debuginfod/30221] Negative cache should differentiate failure types

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30221 Aaron Merey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amerey at redhat dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug debuginfod/30221] Negative cache should differentiate failure types

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30221 --- Comment #8 from Vicki Pfau --- Apologies for the double-post of the first part of that comment. I reloaded the page and apparently hitting the reply button didn't clear the comment at the top and I didn't notice until I replied. -- You a

[Bug debuginfod/30221] Negative cache should differentiate failure types

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30221 --- Comment #7 from Vicki Pfau --- I have a proof of concept patch that I can attach here or submit to the mailing list if you think the xattrs approach is a good way to go. Alternatively, a metadata directory could be added under each buildid

[Bug debuginfod/30221] Negative cache should differentiate failure types

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30221 --- Comment #6 from Frank Ch. Eigler --- (In reply to Vicki Pfau from comment #2) > 404 and the like *may* be transient, but the fact of the matter is that > *most* of the time it won't be And it's a cache, not a definitive answer > saying thi

[Bug debuginfod/30221] Negative cache should differentiate failure types

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30221 --- Comment #5 from Vicki Pfau --- I have a proof of concept patch that I can attach here or submit to the mailing list if you think the xattrs approach is a good way to go. Alternatively, a metadata directory could be added under each buildid

[Bug debuginfod/30221] Negative cache should differentiate failure types

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30221 --- Comment #4 from Frank Ch. Eigler --- (In reply to Vicki Pfau from comment #3) > I have a proof of concept patch that I can attach here or submit to the > mailing list if you think the xattrs approach is a good way to go. > Alternatively, a

[Bug debuginfod/30221] Negative cache should differentiate failure types

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30221 --- Comment #3 from Vicki Pfau --- I have a proof of concept patch that I can attach here or submit to the mailing list if you think the xattrs approach is a good way to go. Alternatively, a metadata directory could be added under each buildid

[Bug debuginfod/30221] Negative cache should differentiate failure types

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30221 --- Comment #2 from Vicki Pfau --- 404 and the like *may* be transient, but the fact of the matter is that *most* of the time it won't be And it's a cache, not a definitive answer saying this will never exist. Having a 404 cache for 10x the am

[Bug debuginfod/30221] Negative cache should differentiate failure types

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30221 Frank Ch. Eigler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fche at redhat dot com --- Comment