https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29158
--- Comment #8 from yuri at tsoft dot com ---
It might be that clang-built and gcc-built code is just compatible.
Not sure if this is the case here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29158
--- Comment #7 from yuri at tsoft dot com ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #6)
> Sorry you have to ask whoever added -I/usr/local/share/gnulib/lib to CFLAGS
> how that is supposed to work. Obviously the argp.h header found there isn'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29158
--- Comment #5 from yuri at tsoft dot com ---
The port adds -I/usr/local/share/gnulib/lib and
LDFLAGS=/usr/local/lib/libargp.so - otherwise it doesn't find argp.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29158
--- Comment #3 from yuri at tsoft dot com ---
Also:
* the problem only exists with gcc, and not with clang-12.
* 0.179 didn't have such problem, so this is a regression.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29158
--- Comment #2 from yuri at tsoft dot com ---
configure arguments:
> --program-prefix=eu- --disable-debuginfod --enable-nls --prefix=/usr/local
configure output:
> checking for library containing argp_parse... none required
config.log file: h
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29158
Bug ID: 29158
Summary: 0.187 fails to build with gcc-10: #error "Please
include config.h first."
Product: elfutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29092
--- Comment #2 from yuri at tsoft dot com ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #1)
> This isn't a new check, it has been there since 0.183.
> If your libc doesn't provide obstack support you probably have to provide a
> library that does
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29093
yuri at tsoft dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|clang fails to compile |clang fails to compile
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29093
Bug ID: 29093
Summary: clang fails to compile 0.187: error.c:50:17:
Product: elfutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
C
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29092
Bug ID: 29092
Summary: error: failed to find _obstack_free
Product: elfutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29048
--- Comment #6 from yuri at tsoft dot com ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #5)
> (In reply to yuri from comment #4)
> > Any chance to make a release with this patch?
>
> A new release is planned for next Monday, 25 April:
> https://
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29048
--- Comment #4 from yuri at tsoft dot com ---
Any chance to make a release with this patch?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29048
--- Comment #2 from yuri at tsoft dot com ---
They are only used as constants,
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29048
Bug ID: 29048
Summary: Symbols DW_SECT_INFO, DW_SECT_ABBREV,
DW_SECT_STR_OFFSETS aren't defined
Product: elfutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
14 matches
Mail list logo
