Hello,
On Thursday, January 30th, 2025 at 12:59 PM, Mark Wielaard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 12:05:59AM +0000, parona wrote:
>
> > While building elfutils on musl with different features enabled I
> > hit this.
> >
> > Curiously this also a
Hi,
While building elfutils on musl with different features enabled I hit this.
Curiously this also affects glibc if you explicitly build without optimizations.
I didn't observe any explicit order with the headers, so I just added it after
the rest.From 4a11af08aea00cbe6362e82a14010ca3ea5fa9e7
Hi,
On Wednesday, January 29th, 2025 at 2:40 PM, Mark Wielaard
wrote:
> I definitely like this patch. But when doing an autoreconf -f -v -i
> (autoconf 2.27) I get:
>
> autoheader: warning: missing template: HAVE_ERROR_H
> autoheader: warning: Use AC_DEFINE([HAVE_ERROR_H], [], [Description])
>
Hi,
On Monday, January 27th, 2025 at 10:40 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> My main question/confusion is where the error.h include comes from.
> elfutils does support libcs like musl who don't provide error.h but do
> provide err.h. Then the build should provide its own error function
> through lib/sy
Hello,
Background for this patch is https://bugs.gentoo.org/948878 where are user had
installed a standalone error implementation for a different package leading to
a build failure.
Decided to automagically link to it instead of forcing it as a dependency as
its only packaged on Gentoo.
https
