Re: build-ids, .debug_sup and other IDs (Was: [PATCH] Handle DWARF 5 separate debug sections)

2021-06-14 Thread Matt Schulte via Elfutils-devel
Thanks for the thoughts! > AIUI, -gsplit-dwarf is more suitable for development/scratch builds > than for distro binaries. If distros agree, then I would not expect > .dwo files to show up in distro-wide debuginfod services, but rather > within developers' own build trees. That's a good point. M

Re: build-ids, .debug_sup and other IDs (Was: [PATCH] Handle DWARF 5 separate debug sections)

2021-06-13 Thread Matt Schulte via Elfutils-devel
Hi Mark, My apologies for bringing this up so late. I was just re-reading this thread while looking at how to find a .dwp for a given binary. > But I was personally assuming we would extend it to also to other things like > dwo IDs (which are again almost identical globally unique identifiers for

debuginfod client as GDB/LLDB Plugin

2021-01-31 Thread Matt Schulte via Elfutils-devel
Hi all! I have been working on a GDB and LLDB python plugin that will bring debuginfod to older versions of GDB and LLDB. It's still in the early stages of development (no support for source loading, no support for Python 2...) but wanted to raise awareness of my work and say thank you for coming