On 3/24/24 14:08, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Martin,
On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 11:11:21AM -0300, Martin Rodriguez Reboredo wrote:
[...]
So this patch is kinda pointless, but at least I've managed to learn
what I was missing. Anyways, thanks for the heads-up. :)
I don't think it was
On 3/20/24 19:52, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 04:22:49PM -0300, Martin Rodriguez Reboredo wrote:
Added new functions dwfl_get_offline_next_address and
dwfl_set_offline_next_address which will get plus set said field from
the Dwfl struct. This is a requirement for
: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo
---
This is meant to replace a patch that only had the setter [1].
Link: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/elfutils-devel/2024q1/006874.html [1]
libdwfl/libdwfl.h| 6 +
libdwfl/offline.c| 12 ++
tests/dwfl-offline-address.c | 43
On 3/2/24 21:05, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Martin,
[...]
It would be interesting to see the perf tool patch. I don't understand
the use case. So I assume perf currently does something which is wrong
and with your patch calling this new dwfl_set_offline_next_addres it
will do the right thing. That
Oh hi Mark!
On 3/2/24 17:47, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Martin,
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:04:05PM -0300, Martin Rodriguez Reboredo wrote:
Added a new function dwfl_set_offline_next_addres which will set said
field from the Dwfl struct. This is a requirement for listing functions
from their
Added a new function dwfl_set_offline_next_addres which will set said
field from the Dwfl struct. This is a requirement for listing functions
from their addresses when using libdwfl offline, otherwise wrong symbols
are going to be returned.
Signed-off-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo
---
libdwfl
