> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 22:35 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 10:55:27AM -0500, Guillermo E. Martinez via
>> Elfutils-devel wrote:
>> > This is the second version patch to avoid remove the CTF section in
>> > stripped files. Changes from v1:
>> >
>> > - Add desc
> Using the NONE relocation doesn't do anything, but is harmless.
>
> This fixes several (self) tests on sparc that use elflint to
> check files are valid ELF.
FWIW looks good to me.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard
> ---
> backends/ChangeLog | 4
> backends/sparc_reloc.def | 2 +-
> Hi Guys,
>
> I apologise - I know that Jose CC'ed me on this topic, but I have lost
> the email, so I am creating this post instead.
>
>> What about using an OS-specific section flag in elf.h, something like:
>> #define SHF_GNU_PERSISTENT 0x0ff1 /* Section must not be
>> stripped. */
>
> [Added Nick in CC.]
>
>> Hi Guillermo,
>>
>> On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 09:26:19PM -0500, Guillermo E. Martinez via
>> Elfutils-devel wrote:
>>> Hello elfutils team,
>>>
>>> This patch is meant to avoid remove the CTF section in
>>> stripped files. Please let me know your thoughts.
>>>
>>> CTF
[Added Nick in CC.]
> Hi Guillermo,
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 09:26:19PM -0500, Guillermo E. Martinez via
> Elfutils-devel wrote:
>> Hello elfutils team,
>>
>> This patch is meant to avoid remove the CTF section in
>> stripped files. Please let me know your thoughts.
>>
>> CTF debug format