Hi Mark,
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025, 4:00 am Mark Wielaard, wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
> TLDR; When using https://patchwork.sourceware.org or Bunsen
> https://builder.sourceware.org/testruns/ you might now have to enable
> javascript. This should not impact any scripts, just browsers (or bots
> pretending
Sourceware infrastructure community updates for Q1 2025
Sourceware has provided the infrastructure for core toolchain
and developer tools projects for more than 25 years.
https://sourceware.org/sourceware-25-roadmap.html
Over the last couple of years, Sourceware has transformed from a
purely volu
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025, at 6:26 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Hi -
>
>> CCLD libdw.so
>> /usr/bin/ld: ../libdwfl/libdwfl_pic.a(dwfl_module_getdwarf.os): in function
>> `open_elf':
>> Calling a public function across the library boundary should be no problem,
>> but we run into this -- circu
Hi -
> CCLD libdw.so
> /usr/bin/ld: ../libdwfl/libdwfl_pic.a(dwfl_module_getdwarf.os): in function
> `open_elf':
> Calling a public function across the library boundary should be no problem,
> but we run into this -- circular dependency?
It might just require the libdw.so LDFLAGS/LDADD to
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025, at 10:17 AM, Aaron Merey wrote:
> dwfl_st or dwflst prefixes work for me. I think I slightly prefer
> dwfl_st. As for where to define Dwfl_Process_tracker let's try to keep
> it to the new dwfl_stacktraceP.h and if possible use forward
> declarations to avoid circular depen
On 2025-04-22 14:06, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 13:36, Guinevere Larsen via Gcc
> wrote:
> >
> > On 4/21/25 12:59 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > Hi hackers,
> > >
> > > TLDR; When using https://patchwork.sourceware.org or Bunsen
> > > https://builder.sourceware.org/testruns/
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025, 14:17 Guinevere Larsen, wrote:
>
> On 4/22/25 10:06 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 13:36, Guinevere Larsen via Gcc
> > wrote:
> >> On 4/21/25 12:59 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >>> Hi hackers,
> >>>
> >>> TLDR; When using https://patchwork.sourceware.org
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:24 AM Serhei Makarov wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025, at 10:17 AM, Aaron Merey wrote:
> >> One question this raises re: the Dwfl_Process_Tracker structure and where
> >> its implementation should be located. In the patches, the Dwfl struct
> >> implementation includes
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025, at 10:17 AM, Aaron Merey wrote:
>> One question this raises re: the Dwfl_Process_Tracker structure and where
>> its implementation should be located. In the patches, the Dwfl struct
>> implementation includes a pointer to a Dwfl_Process_Tracker. I’m not sure if
>> elfuti
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 9:53 AM Serhei Makarov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025, at 9:45 AM, Aaron Merey wrote:
> >
> > Let's move the process_tracker interface as well for additional
> > flexibility to modify if needed. As for a name, I like
> > libdwfl_stacktrace. It clearly communicates the purpos
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025, at 9:45 AM, Aaron Merey wrote:
> Hi Serhei,
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 9:27 AM Serhei Makarov wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 21, 2025, at 12:29 AM, Aaron Merey wrote:.
>> >
>> > I know we're close to the next release and I do want this work to be
>> > included. My proposal is
Hi Serhei,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 9:27 AM Serhei Makarov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2025, at 12:29 AM, Aaron Merey wrote:.
> >
> > I know we're close to the next release and I do want this work to be
> > included. My proposal is to move the current API out of libdwfl and
> > into a new library,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025, at 12:29 AM, Aaron Merey wrote:.
>
> I know we're close to the next release and I do want this work to be
> included. My proposal is to move the current API out of libdwfl and
> into a new library, as-is but clearly marked as experimental and
> subject to possible API/ABI
On 4/22/25 10:06 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 13:36, Guinevere Larsen via Gcc wrote:
On 4/21/25 12:59 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi hackers,
TLDR; When using https://patchwork.sourceware.org or Bunsen
https://builder.sourceware.org/testruns/ you might now have to enable
jav
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 13:36, Guinevere Larsen via Gcc wrote:
>
> On 4/21/25 12:59 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Hi hackers,
> >
> > TLDR; When using https://patchwork.sourceware.org or Bunsen
> > https://builder.sourceware.org/testruns/ you might now have to enable
> > javascript. This should not
On 4/21/25 12:59 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi hackers,
TLDR; When using https://patchwork.sourceware.org or Bunsen
https://builder.sourceware.org/testruns/ you might now have to enable
javascript. This should not impact any scripts, just browsers (or bots
pretending to be browsers). If it does ca
16 matches
Mail list logo
