☺ Buildbot (Sourceware): elfutils - build successful (main)

A restored build has been detected on builder elfutils-debian-armhf while building elfutils. Full details are available at: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/6/builds/404 Build state: build successful Revision: 3b71249d4396f742d68e774313c2a2d9caf4d668 Worker: debian-armhf Bu

☺ Buildbot (Sourceware): elfutils - build successful (main)

A restored build has been detected on builder elfutils-debian-ppc64 while building elfutils. Full details are available at: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/63/builds/480 Build state: build successful Revision: f33f4c85581045ae493e7f12c6ba1bf5829d8192 Worker: debian-ppc64 B

Re: [PATCH] Avoid double-including config.h

Hi Dmitry, On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 04:07:26PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 01:55:48PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > So to be (pedantically) correct should we include the attached? > > Yes, this should be fine, along with > > --- a/lib/crc32.c > +++ b/lib/crc32.c > @@

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add some supporting framework for C11-style atomics.

Hi Dmitry, On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 04:04:21PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 01:38:01PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > But maybe we should just use AC_CHECK_HEADERS([stdatomic.h]) and drop > > the AC_COMPILE_IFELSE trick? > > Sure. And if we want to keep AC_MSG_ERROR, t