Signed-off-by: Xi Ruoyao
---
backends/loongarch_reloc.def | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/backends/loongarch_reloc.def b/backends/loongarch_reloc.def
index a39eefd9..cdc83211 100644
--- a/backends/loongarch_reloc.def
+++ b/backends/loongarch_reloc.def
@@ -12
Adds new LoongArch relocations.
Signed-off-by: Xi Ruoyao
---
libelf/elf.h | 31 ++-
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libelf/elf.h b/libelf/elf.h
index 7b4a8fe4..f2206e5c 100644
--- a/libelf/elf.h
+++ b/libelf/elf.h
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* This
LoongArch psABI v2.30 has introduced 17 new reloc types for TLS
descriptor, TLS LE relaxation, and medium code model function call. Add
them to elfutils.
Tested on loongarch64-linux-gnu with Binutils-2.42 and GCC 14 (trunk).
Xi Ruoyao (2):
libelf: Sync elf.h from glibc
backends: Update list
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 04:53:19PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 04:00:47PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Hi Omar,
> >
> > On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 01:22 -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > > The final piece of DWARF package file support is that offsets have to be
> > > interpre
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 04:00:47PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Omar,
>
> On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 01:22 -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > The final piece of DWARF package file support is that offsets have to be
> > interpreted relative to the section offset from the package index.
> > .debug_abbre
Hi Omar,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 09:54:29AM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 02:34:18PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Update the documentation of dwarf_cu_dwp_section_info to make clear
> > that the function only returns an error if the DWARF package file data
> > couldn't b
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 02:34:18PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Update the documentation of dwarf_cu_dwp_section_info to make clear
> that the function only returns an error if the DWARF package file data
> couldn't be read or an unknown section constant is provided. Missing
> DWP information for
Hi Frank,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 10:35 AM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> > > We could then also introduce a new public function, dwarf_getdieranges
> > > (?) that does the new thing. But it doesn't have to be public on the
> > > first try as long as dwarf_addrdie and dwfl_module_addrdie work. (We
>
Hi -
> > We could then also introduce a new public function, dwarf_getdieranges
> > (?) that does the new thing. But it doesn't have to be public on the
> > first try as long as dwarf_addrdie and dwfl_module_addrdie work. (We
> > might want to change the interface of dwarf_getdieranges so it can b
