https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29472
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #5
Hi Nick,
On Tue, 2023-02-28 at 12:59 +, Nick Clifton wrote:
> > O, this surprises me. I wasn't aware binutils strip keeps unallocated
> > sections by default. But apparently it does. It doesn't seem specific
> > to ".ctf". Do you know why? This seems counter to how strip is supposed
> > to beh
A restored build has been detected on builder elfutils-centos-x86_64 while
building elfutils.
Full details are available at:
https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/39/builds/165
Build state: build successful
Revision: e24d8a4a3ea106608bb3e8d33c4639cf71d0f08d
Worker: centos-x86_64
A new failure has been detected on builder elfutils-centos-x86_64 while
building elfutils.
Full details are available at:
https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/39/builds/164
Build state: failed test (failure)
Revision: e24d8a4a3ea106608bb3e8d33c4639cf71d0f08d
Worker: centos-x86_6
Hi Mark,
O, this surprises me. I wasn't aware binutils strip keeps unallocated
sections by default. But apparently it does. It doesn't seem specific
to ".ctf". Do you know why? This seems counter to how strip is supposed
to behave, at least how I understand it.
Actually thinking about it, ther
Hi Mark,
Oh, I see, thanks for your comment!. My intention with this patch is to
replicate the same proceeding by _default_ implemented in `binutils strip'
tool, it is: not remove CTF section, except it is indicated explicitly.
O, this surprises me. I wasn't aware binutils strip keeps unalloca
Hi Guillermo,
CCed Nick to see if he knows why binutils strip does what it does.
On Fri, 2023-02-24 at 10:48 -0600, Guillermo E. Martinez wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 12:51:25PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
>
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:42:37PM -0600, Guillermo E. Martinez via
> > Elfu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29434
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
Hi,
On Wed, 2023-02-22 at 23:39 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> When there is an error in dwarf_getscopes after the initial scopes
> have been allocated, e.g. when looking for the inlined scopes, then
> the scopes would leak. Fix this by explicitly free the scopes on error.
>
> https://sourceware.o
