Re: [PATCH] libebl: Do not require EI_OSABI for IFUNC.

Hi Martin, On Thu, 2022-11-24 at 13:23 +0100, Martin Liška wrote: > Similar fix to: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29718 > > Ready for master? Assuming runtime, glibc/ld.so, accepts this without EI_OSABI set to ELFOSABI_LINUX, it seems ok to print it as GNU_IFUNC. > e

[Bug tools/29826] eu-readelf prints out LOOS+0 instead of "IFUNC"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29826 Martin Liska changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |mliska at suse dot cz

[PATCH] libebl: Do not require EI_OSABI for IFUNC.

Similar fix to: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29718 Ready for master? Thanks, Martin PR 29826 libebl/ChangeLog: * eblsymboltypename.c (ebl_symbol_type_name): Do not require EI_OSABI for IFUNC --- libebl/eblsymboltypename.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3

[Bug tools/29826] New: eu-readelf prints out LOOS+0 instead of "IFUNC"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29826 Bug ID: 29826 Summary: eu-readelf prints out LOOS+0 instead of "IFUNC" Product: elfutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compon

Re: [PATCH 1/7] Rename 'hello2.spec.' -> 'hello2.spec' 'hello3.spec.' -> 'hello3.spec'

Thanks, works fine On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 9:29 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 18:07 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > So maybe we just should rename them to .specfile? > > That is what the attached patch does, plus some other cleanups. > > - We forgot to include the hell