https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28204
Ryan Goldberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #14208|0 |1
is obsolete|
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 10:02 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> I wonder if we should generalize that for other DEBUGINFOD_envs. But
> instead of adding more environment variables have a debuginfod control
> file like we already have for cache_clean_interval, max_unused_age and
> cache_miss.
>
> So as an
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 13:36 -0700, Daniel Thornburgh via Elfutils-devel
wrote:
> So, I put together a design with this approach, and it passed a security
> review, so the approach broadly seems to work for us.
>
> It came up in review that it'd be considerably more usable to have the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29434
--- Comment #8 from Pablo Galindo Salgado ---
If you give me a patch adding print statements to libdw/dwarf_getscopes.c and
libdw/libdw_visit_scopes.c I can give you the output.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29434
--- Comment #7 from Pablo Galindo Salgado ---
The dwarf trie comes from /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so in a RHEL7 system
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29434
--- Comment #6 from Pablo Galindo Salgado ---
What would be the best way to provide that?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29434
--- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #3)
> But if the result is zero I don't believe I fully understand yet how the
> leak happens.
So I believe this may happen if we found an inlined subroutine with p
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29434
--- Comment #4 from Pablo Galindo Salgado ---
The first result is already 0 in
int result = __libdw_visit_scopes (0, &cu, NULL, &pc_match, &pc_record, &a);
I think this is because walk_children finds no "real children" so it returns
with the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29434
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Pablo Galindo Salgado from comment #2)
> > it could in theory also be zero
>
> In this case, the result was 0 (I am working with Matt)
Interesting, I assumed it was on a failure path.
My pro
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29434
--- Comment #2 from Pablo Galindo Salgado ---
> it could in theory also be zero
In this case, the result was 0 (I am working with Matt)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29434
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |mark at klomp dot org
Ever
Hi Noah,
On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 11:32 -0400, Noah Sanci via Elfutils-devel wrote:
> Please find the patch for pr28284 attached
>
> Debuginfod and debuginfod clients are now equipped to send
> and receive http headers prefixed with X-DEBUGINFOD and
> print them in verbose mode for more
12 matches
Mail list logo
