On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 12:11 AM Alexander Kanavin
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 05:13, Érico Nogueira wrote:
>>
>> For what it's worth, most of the time64 support patches that I have seen
>> use "%lld" and `long long` as the type for portable representation of
>> time, instead of intmax_t, b
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 01:12:17AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 05:58:19PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > It may have to do with --as-needed that some builds use. If there are
> > no pending undefined references, some linkers drop earlier shared object
> > referen
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 05:13, Érico Nogueira wrote:
> For what it's worth, most of the time64 support patches that I have seen
> use "%lld" and `long long` as the type for portable representation of
> time, instead of intmax_t, but each should work just as well as the
> other.
>
My original vers
