Hello Mark,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Wielaard
> Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 8:02 AM
> To: Sonal Santan ; elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: Working with ELF already loaded in memory
>
> Hi Sinal,
>
> On Thu, 2021-07-08 at 05:02 +, Sonal Santan via Elfutils-devel
Hello,
Please find the patch information for pr25978 attached.
Noah Sanci
From af80431af96b3d1f921df264672829db71b46d20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Noah
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:29:45 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] debuginfod: PR25978 - Created the prefetch fdcache
The debuginfod fdcache-prefetch l
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 2:37 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> On Wed, 2021-07-07 at 13:24 -0700, Andrei Homescu wrote:
> > I wrote this patch on behalf of someone else, so the copyright line
> > should be:
> > Copyright (C) 2021 Runsafe Security, Inc.
>
> OK, changed.
>
> > > The testcase
Hi Noah,
On Thu, 2021-07-08 at 10:48 -0400, Noah Sanci via Elfutils-devel wrote:
> Find the patch information for pr27711 attached .
Looks good. Pushed.
Thanks,
Mark
Hi,
On Thu, 2021-07-08 at 09:12 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > If they are portions of the full fdcache shouldn't there be a check
> > in the code that the specified fdcache_prefetch_fds and
> > fdcache_prefetch_mbs aren't larger than fdcache_fds and fdcache_mbs? Or
> > maybe they should be gi
Hi Sinal,
On Thu, 2021-07-08 at 05:02 +, Sonal Santan via Elfutils-devel
wrote:
> Going through the libdw it appears that all APIs require either a
> file handle or a file name of the ELF object to create a session.
> Since we do not have access to the ELF file -- but rather the ELF
> file con
Hello,
Find the patch information for pr27711 attached .
Noah Sanci
From f126b48bf1131070d80e063bfd296ddb69af8c9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Noah
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 14:40:10 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] debuginfod: PR27711 - Use -I/-X regexes during groom phase
The debuginfod -I/-X regexes ope
Hi Alice,
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 16:15 -0400, Alice Zhang via Elfutils-devel
wrote:
> Also introduced DEBUGINFOD_RETRY_LIMIT_ENV_VAR and default
> DEBUGINFOD_RETRY_LIMIT(which is 2).
>
> Correponding test has been added to tests/run-debuginfod-find.sh
>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Zhang
Nice. But tr
Hi -
> If they are portions of the full fdcache shouldn't there be a check in
> the code that the specified fdcache_prefetch_fds and
> fdcache_prefetch_mbs aren't larger than fdcache_fds and fdcache_mbs? Or
> maybe they should be given as percentages?
We've iterated on a couple of ways of represe
Hi Noah,
Like the other patch this really needs a commit message.
If I understand the code correctly you are introducing another cache
just for prefetches separate from the fdcache. But this new cache is a
part of larger libarchive_fdcache so access to it is shared with the
existing one, it is jus
On Thu, 2021-07-08 at 09:53 +, build...@builder.wildebeest.org
wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder elfutils-centos-
> x86_64 while building elfutils.
> Full details are available at:
> https://builder.wildebeest.org/buildbot/#builders/1/builds/784
>
> Buildbot URL:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder elfutils-centos-x86_64 while
building elfutils.
Full details are available at:
https://builder.wildebeest.org/buildbot/#builders/1/builds/784
Buildbot URL: https://builder.wildebeest.org/buildbot/
Worker for this Build: centos-x86_64
Build
Hi Andrei,
On Wed, 2021-07-07 at 13:24 -0700, Andrei Homescu wrote:
> I wrote this patch on behalf of someone else, so the copyright line
> should be:
> Copyright (C) 2021 Runsafe Security, Inc.
OK, changed.
> > The testcase already fails before the patch and succeeds after, but
> > it would be
13 matches
Mail list logo
