Hi,Using dyninst, I am trying to access local variables and arguments of a
function which is part of a go binary.To get local variables, dyninst uses
libdw to find all the modules. It uses dwarf_nextcu function of libdw to find
all the modules of binary.When I compile a go binary using "go build
Hi all,
On Mon, 2021-02-01 at 16:04 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> I believe I reviewed all pending patches, please yell and scream if I
> missed something.
>
> It has been 3 months since 0.182. There have been almost 100 commits.
> Various bug fixes. And some issues, like recognizing SHF_GNU_RETA
Hi,
Just for the list to have it archived.
We did briefly discuss this on irc.
The changes have already been pushed.
On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 18:24 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 20:45 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler via Elfutils-
> devel wrote:
> > - New prometheus metrics to t
Set version to 0.183
Update NEWS and elfutils.spec.in.
Set copyright year in configure.ac and printversion.
Regenerate po/*.po files.
Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard
---
ChangeLog |6 +
NEWS| 16 +
config/ChangeLog|4 +
config/elfutils.spec.in |
On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 21:00 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 02:52:06PM -0300, Érico Nogueira via
> Elfutils-devel wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/backends/ppc_initreg.c b/backends/ppc_initreg.c
> > index 0e0d3599..e5cca7e1 100644
> > --- a/backends/ppc_initreg.c
> > +++ b/backe
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 02:52:06PM -0300, Érico Nogueira via Elfutils-devel
wrote:
> From: Érico Rolim
>
> Necessary on musl for struct pt_regs definition, doesn't affect the
> build on glibc, since includes the same header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Érico Rolim
> ---
> backends/ChangeLog | 4 +
From: Érico Rolim
Necessary on musl for struct pt_regs definition, doesn't affect the
build on glibc, since includes the same header.
Signed-off-by: Érico Rolim
---
backends/ChangeLog | 4
backends/ppc_initreg.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/backends/ChangeLog
Hi Timm,
On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 15:44 +0100, Timm Bäder via Elfutils-devel wrote:
> Get rid of a nested function this way.
I must say I still don't fully understand this code. But at least I can
see that the reworked code does the same thing as the original. So I
added a ChangeLog entry and pushed
Em 05/02/2021 12:06, Mark Wielaard escreveu:
Hi,
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 06:22 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
Said that, I think it's safe to include right before
on powerpc since in glibc the latter includes the former.
So that would move the include after the
include. Érico, would that
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27092
Frank Ch. Eigler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27323
Frank Ch. Eigler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Hi Frank,
On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 20:45 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler via Elfutils-devel wrote:
> PR27092: debuginfod low-memory handling
>
> A couple of closely related pieces of work allow more early warning
> about low storage/memory conditions:
>
> - New prometheus metrics to
Hi Frank,
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 16:59 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler via Elfutils-devel wrote:
> PR27323 debuginfod: improve query concurrency with grooming
>
> Start using a second sqlite3 database connection for webapi query
> servicing. This allows much better concurrency when long-r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27351
christian.morales.vega at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christian.mor
Hi Timm,
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 11:23 +0100, Timm Bäder via Elfutils-devel wrote:
> advance_pc() uses show_op_index to save whether the current op_index
> is
> > 0 OR the new op_index is > 0.
>
> The new op index is calculated via
>
> new_op_index = (op_index + op_advance) % max_ops_per_instr;
>
Hi,
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 06:22 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> Said that, I think it's safe to include right before
> on powerpc since in glibc the latter includes the former.
So that would move the include after the
include. Érico, would that work in your case?
Thanks,
Mark
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 03:46:42PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 05:56 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 09:16:56PM -0300, Érico Nogueira via Elfutils-devel
> > wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I'm not sure if it's a bug in this configure.ac or this macro, but
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21002
Bug 21002 depends on bug 21010, which changed state.
Bug 21010 Summary: Incompatible with MUSL libc: strerror_r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21010
What|Removed |Added
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21010
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
Resolut
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 05:56 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 09:16:56PM -0300, Érico Nogueira via Elfutils-devel
> wrote:
> [...]
> > I'm not sure if it's a bug in this configure.ac or this macro, but
> > _GNU_SOURCE wasn't defined and lead to XSI strerror_r being used on
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27351
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry V. Levin ---
I second this.
The only technical complication I see is that debugedit uses Autotest for
testing while the rest of elfutils uses tests driven by Automake.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27351
Bug ID: 27351
Summary: please add a debugedit binary to elfutils
Product: elfutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: t
22 matches
Mail list logo
