0.178 release next week

2019-07-12 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, In another thread I said I would like to do a release end of this week with the csky backend and the elfclassify tool integrated. But I didn't make enough time for reviews, so that moves to next week. Sorry. I should have enough time next week. But we will have to see if we can polish the csk

Re: [[RESEND & PING]PATCH V3 1/1] Add backend support for C-SKY

2019-07-12 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Mon, 2019-06-03 at 16:16 +0800, Mao Han wrote: > diff --git a/backends/csky_reloc.def b/backends/csky_reloc.def > new file mode 100644 > index 000..1108f0c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/backends/csky_reloc.def > @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ > +/* List the relocation types for csky. -*- C -*- > + Copyright

Re: [[RESEND & PING]PATCH V3 0/1] Add C-SKY support

2019-07-12 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Mon, 2019-06-03 at 16:16 +0800, Mao Han wrote: > 5. run-reverse-sections-self.sh > elfcopy --reverse-offs dose not work properly on C-SKY object file, > seems not related to arch specific code. > size.o before copy: > https://github.com/c-sky/test-result/blob/master/elfutils/size.o > size.o.rev

Re: [[RESEND & PING]PATCH V3 0/1] Add C-SKY support

2019-07-12 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Fri, 2019-07-12 at 19:22 +0800, Mao Han wrote: > I've generated binaries/core with an upstream toolchain, however the > divzero testcase doesn't cause any coredump, so I used a zeroptr > testcase instead. > https://github.com/c-sky/test-result/blob/master/elfutils/zeroptr > https://github.com/c-

Re: [[RESEND & PING]PATCH V3 0/1] Add C-SKY support

2019-07-12 Thread Mao Han
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 03:36:03PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > the EM_CSKY_OLD equals to 39. We have changed the EM number to 252 in > > our newly released toolchain with compatibility to EM_CSKY_OLD. > > See binutils/include/elf/common.h: > > /* C-SKY historically used 39, the same value as MC