[Bug tools/24795] eu-unstrip doesn't recognize MIPS_DWARF as debug section

2019-07-09 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24795 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #1) > (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0) > > Consider the section header table of a hello world exec on debian 7 MIPS: > > BTW. Isn't Debian 7 really old? >

[Bug tools/24795] eu-unstrip doesn't recognize MIPS_DWARF as debug section

2019-07-09 Thread mark at klomp dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24795 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mark at klomp dot org --- Comment #1

[Bug tools/24795] New: eu-unstrip doesn't recognize MIPS_DWARF as debug section

2019-07-09 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24795 Bug ID: 24795 Summary: eu-unstrip doesn't recognize MIPS_DWARF as debug section Product: elfutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] elfutils: don't use dlopen() for libebl modules

2019-07-09 Thread Omar Sandoval
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 09:14:03PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi Omar, > > On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 14:02 -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote: > > I imagine that little by little, most of the libebl functionality could > > be converted in this way, and that's how we could chip away at the size > > increase

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] elfutils: don't use dlopen() for libebl modules

2019-07-09 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Omar, On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 14:02 -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote: > I imagine that little by little, most of the libebl functionality could > be converted in this way, and that's how we could chip away at the size > increase of the elfutils binaries. > > Do you have any objections to patches 1-4 o