Re: [PATCH] Skip run-readelf-compressed.sh test if built without bzip2

2019-01-13 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:30:19PM +, Ulf Hermann wrote: > Obviously, we cannot read the compressed ELF file if no bzip2 support is > present. Added a ChangeLog and pushed to master. Please don't sent patches with base64 encoding. That make it really hard to apply them with git am. Thanks, M

Re: RISC-V support

2019-01-13 Thread Jim Wilson
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 5:23 PM Kurt Roeckx wrote: > O32 really has at least the following variants: > - O32 FP32 > - O32 FPXX > - O32 FP64 > - O32 FP64A The FPXX and FP64A stuff is new, after I stopped tracking MIPS stuff, so I hadn't noticed it. I see why they added these, but if you count sof

[Bug general/24000] couple of testsuite fails with uclibc library

2019-01-13 Thread mark at klomp dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24000 --- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard --- Sorry, I have no idea what is going on. It looks like a normal arm ELF file: $ eu-readelf -h nm.o ELF Header: Magic: 7f 45 4c 46 01 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Class:

[Bug general/24068] readelf.c:10152:15: error: ‘%*llx’ directive output between 4 and 2147483647 bytes may cause result to exceed ‘INT_MAX’ [-Werror=format-overflow=] with -m32

2019-01-13 Thread mark at klomp dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24068 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libdw/23982] dwarf_formref_die() does not support DW_FORM_indirect

2019-01-13 Thread mark at klomp dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23982 --- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard --- As with your other bug without at least some example DWARF files this will be somewhat hard to support. I think I know what would be needed, but without actual testcases it will be hard to get right. --

[Bug libdw/23981] dwarf_siblingof() fails with attribute form DW_FORM_ref_addr

2019-01-13 Thread mark at klomp dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23981 --- Comment #4 from Mark Wielaard --- (In reply to Andreas Kromke from comment #3) > I changed the source file accordingly, rebuilt the library and rerun the > tests. The result is, unfortunately, the same, i.e. there is no improvement. > > A

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add untested 32-bit core file support.

2019-01-13 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 04:37:51PM -0800, Jim Wilson wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 2:29 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > static const Ebl_Register_Location prstatus_regs[] = > > >{ > > > -{ .offset = 8, .regno = 1, .count = 31, .bits = 64 } /* x1..x31 */ > > > +{ .offset = BITS/8, .reg