https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23916
--- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard ---
I filed a binutils bug with patch.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23919
If you are able to test patch that on your setup to see if it resolves the
issue with objtool that would be really
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23916
--- Comment #4 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #3)
> On a related note: should eu-elflint complain on originally compiled
> rapl.o.back (from tarball)? That would ease detecting non-conformant
> binutils ver
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23921
Bug ID: 23921
Summary: elflint should check (minimum) section alignment
sanity
Product: elfutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23920
Bug ID: 23920
Summary: elflint should check sanity check Chdr fields and
uncompressed data of compressed sections
Product: elfutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23902
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|varlocs |varlocs
|dwarf_cfi_
On Fri, 2018-11-23 at 21:20 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> We would not relocate when the relocation section data or the target
> section date would overlap with one of the ELF headers. This is only
> really necessary if the data comes directly from the mmapped file.
> Otherwise there is no real ove
On Fri, 2018-11-23 at 21:08 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> When building with -Og gcc is unable to see that __libdw_dieabbrev ()
> will initialize what the second argument points to when no error
> occurs
> as called by dwarf_child and dwarf_getattrs. Causing an possibly
> uninitialized error. Just
