eh_frame is debug info too

2018-09-17 Thread Sasha Da Rocha Pinheiro
Hi, I have found a bug in Dyninst related to the fact that dwarf_begin_elf() won't create a (Dwarf *) handle given a stripped binary which contains the section ".eh_frame". This section is sometimes generated to the detriment of ".debug_frames", which is omitted, while all info about frames are

[Bug tools/23673] TEST ./tests/backtrace-dwarf fails on s390x in 0.174 release

2018-09-17 Thread mark at klomp dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673 --- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard --- It does seem to work correctly on Fedora 29 with gcc 8.2, binutils 2.31 and glibc 2.28: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/elfutils/0.174/1.fc29/data/logs/s390x/build.log PASS: run-backtrace-d

[Bug tools/23673] TEST ./tests/backtrace-dwarf fails on s390x in 0.174 release

2018-09-17 Thread mliska at suse dot cz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liska --- $ ld --version GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE:Factory:zSystems) 2.31 $ /lib64/libc.so.6 GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.28 (git 3c03baca37fd). -- You are receiving this mail because: Yo

[Bug tools/23673] TEST ./tests/backtrace-dwarf fails on s390x in 0.174 release

2018-09-17 Thread mark at klomp dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673 --- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard --- Note that we have an s390x fedora buildbot worker that also uses GCC 8.1.1: https://builder.wildebeest.org/buildbot/#/workers/5 That one is green. So I suspect it is either a different binutils or glibc (

[Bug tools/23673] New: TEST ./tests/backtrace-dwarf fails on s390x in 0.174 release

2018-09-17 Thread mliska at suse dot cz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673 Bug ID: 23673 Summary: TEST ./tests/backtrace-dwarf fails on s390x in 0.174 release Product: elfutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm