Hi,
The DW_AT_rnglists_base attribute is not listed in section 3.1.2 of DWARF5.pdf,
which lists
the allowed attributes for DW_TAG_skeleton_unit. However, in section 3.1.3, it
says that the
split full compile unit (the one in the .dwo) inherits the value of
DW_AT_rnglists_base from
the correspo
On 2020-07-09 12:30 p.m., Michael Eager wrote:
> On 7/1/20 9:53 PM, Simon Marchi via Dwarf-Discuss wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The DW_AT_rnglists_base attribute is not listed in section 3.1.2 of
>> DWARF5.pdf, which lists
>> the allowed attributes for DW_TAG_skeleton
On 2021-03-10 10:59 a.m., Jakub Jelinek via Dwarf-Discuss wrote:> Hi!
>
> We got a report today that GCC even for -gdwarf-5 -gsplit-dwarf uses
> .debug_rnglists section + DW_AT_ranges + DW_AT_low_pc + DW_AT_rnglists_base
> attributes in the DW_TAG_skeleton_unit (and then some DW_AT_ranges in
> .de
> But you've got me thinking Perhaps we should have *both*
> .debug_rnglists *and* .debug_rnglists.dwo. The former could contain
> only the range list needed for the DW_AT_ranges attribute in the
> skeleton CU, while the latter would contain the range lists for any
> DW_AT_r
In Section 6.1.1.2, the parent index entry attribute is described as:
Parent debugging information entry, a reference to the index entry for
the parent. This is represented as the offset of the entry relative to
the start of the entry pool.
But in Table 6.1, DW_IDX_parent is described as:
On 5/5/25 6:31 PM, David Broman via Dwarf-discuss wrote:
> Thanks for the information.
>
>
>
> There are unofficial patches to both gcc and gdb to support 6809. Neither of
> them support DWARF.
I don't know much about these old CPUs, but it looks like GDB
supports the 6811, and the source fi
On 4/17/25 3:58 PM, Tom Tromey via Dwarf-discuss wrote:
> Consider the appended Ada program. Here, the offset of "Another_Field"
> is a non-constant number of bits from the start of the object.
>
> I think there is no way to represent this in DWARF 5. Section 5.7.6,
> page 119 says:
>
> For
