I think that's orthogonal to the point, which was that a rnglist is
meant to describe a pc range, not a data range.
BTW, I don't think you need to create the vtable on the fly in that
case. The Pkg.Print function will need a static link, but the vtable
doesn't need to encode that. I just chec
BTW, I don't think you need to create the vtable on the fly in that
case. The Pkg.Print function will need a static link, but the vtable
doesn't need to encode that. I just checked our Ada compiler. We
stopped development on this compiler after Ada 95, but the only change I
had to make to your e
In 250506.2, the use of a rnglist is throwing me. I would expect the lifetime
of a vtable to be the whole program. Or did you envision the rnglist to be the
range of data/rodata addresses of the vtable object? 2.17 clarifies that
they're code addresses (i.e. text), though.
We did have a disc
Can unions have virtual functions and thus vtables? My understanding is
that unions can have member functions but I can't see how they can have
virtual functions? What function would you call? Where would you put the
vtable pointer?
This article on C++ reference suggests that they cannot have
Hello,
On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 2:49 PM Todd Allen via Dwarf-discuss
wrote:
> In 250506.2, the use of a rnglist is throwing me. I would expect the
> lifetime of a vtable to be the whole program. Or did you envision the
> rnglist to be the range of data/rodata addresses of the vtable object? 2.
On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 4:11 PM Todd Allen wrote:
> I think that's orthogonal to the point, which was that a rnglist is
> meant to describe a pc range, not a data range.
Got it; I did not get this was your point, I was mainly reacting to
the part of your message “I would expect the lifetime of a v
>
> In 250506.2, the use of a rnglist is throwing me. I would expect the
> lifetime of a vtable to be the whole program. Or did you envision the
> rnglist to be the range of data/rodata addresses of the vtable object?
> 2.17 clarifies that they're code addresses (i.e. text), though.
>
The DW_AT_
