Re: [Dwarf-discuss] Alternative to 250130.1 (index valued DW_AT_object_pointer): LEB128 relative DIE offsets

2025-02-03 Thread Paul Robinson via Dwarf-discuss
Also, fixed-size DIEs are much easier when quickly scanning for something; you can derive the size of the DIE from the abbrev without having to look at the DIE content. When you have variable-size values such as LEB128 then you need to parse the values in order to determine where the next DIE start

Re: [Dwarf-discuss] Alternative to 250130.1 (index valued DW_AT_object_pointer): LEB128 relative DIE offsets

2025-02-03 Thread David Blaikie via Dwarf-discuss
On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 8:01 AM Paul Robinson wrote: > Also, fixed-size DIEs are much easier when quickly scanning for something; > you can derive the size of the DIE from the abbrev without having to look > at the DIE content. When you have variable-size values such as LEB128 then > you need to p