I has occurred to me that simply restricting skeleton CUs
to use DW_FORM_string or DW_FORM_strp
would restore the unique meaning of DW_AT_str_offsets_base
to apply to the dwp (letting non-skeleton CUs use
DW_FORM_strx1 etc ). With seemingly little impact on
overall size.
DavidA.
___
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:33 AM David Anderson via Dwarf-Discuss <
dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org> wrote:
> I has occurred to me that simply restricting skeleton CUs
> to use DW_FORM_string or DW_FORM_strp
> would restore the unique meaning of DW_AT_str_offsets_base
> to apply to the dwp (lett
On 8/31/20 1:03 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
I'd rather go with LLVM's existing interpretation - that strx
encodings used in .dwo do not attempt to use str_offsets in the skeleton.
But I wouldn't mind adding a str_offsets_base to the split full unit
to make it clear - this would be consistent with rn
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 8:22 PM David Anderson
wrote:
> On 8/31/20 1:03 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
> > I'd rather go with LLVM's existing interpretation - that strx
> > encodings used in .dwo do not attempt to use str_offsets in the skeleton.
> > But I wouldn't mind adding a str_offsets_base to the
