Hi,
I just submitted an issue proposal for adding DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14.
But don't have an issue number yet. See proposal below.
I also had a question about issue 120628.1 which proposes to add
DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_03. The current DWARFv4 DW_LANG_C_plus_plus says it
is for ISO C++:1998. As far as
On 10/08/2014 06:57 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
I just submitted an issue proposal for adding DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14.
But don't have an issue number yet. See proposal below.
I also had a question about issue 120628.1 which proposes to add
DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_03. The current DWARFv4 DW_LANG_C_plus_p
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 08:13 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Actually, it's not clear to me why we need multiple standard levels at
> all. What differences are there that aren't directly expressed by new
> TAGs and such?
It is mainly for consumers that allow users to interact with the program
desc
