Hi,
This came up on the gcc list when extending the number of DWARF type
qualifier modifiers that are handled. But the issue can be shown with
just const and volatile.
The issue is that there is no ordering constraint on the type qualifier
modifier tags (they can appear in any order), but the typ
On 09/25/14 08:18, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
This came up on the gcc list when extending the number of DWARF type
qualifier modifiers that are handled. But the issue can be shown with
just const and volatile.
The issue is that there is no ordering constraint on the type qualifier
modifier tags (
Hi Mark,
IMHO, the compiler should be picking a canonical order for the
qualifiers in the DWARF, just like it does for name mangling:
% cat xxx.cxx
void fpcvi(const volatile int*){}
void fpvci(volatile const int*){}
% g++ -g -c xxx.cxx
% nm -C xxx.o
T fpcvi(int const volatile*)
0
