Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Proposal to reserve .debug_macro opcode 0xff

2014-10-01 Thread Petr Machata
Jakub Jelinek writes: > All of values from DW_MACRO_lo_user to DW_MACRO_hi_user are meant for > vendor extensions and can have arbitrary arguments, I doubt > the particular one (with an integer and inline string argument) > is useful for anything. If a vendor needs an extension with a string > a

Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Proposal to reserve .debug_macro opcode 0xff

2014-09-30 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 01:30:46AM +0200, Petr Machata wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working on support in elfutils for the .debug_macro proposal[1]. > > The numerical values and semantics of DW_MACINFO_* opcodes are > equivalent to their new-style DW_MACRO_* counterparts. So a decoder > could transpa

Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Proposal to reserve .debug_macro opcode 0xff

2014-09-30 Thread Michael Eager
On 09/30/14 16:30, Petr Machata wrote: Hello, I'm working on support in elfutils for the .debug_macro proposal[1]. The numerical values and semantics of DW_MACINFO_* opcodes are equivalent to their new-style DW_MACRO_* counterparts. So a decoder could transparently read in .debug_macro instead