> Thanks, I didn't know that. The proposal was certainly written with the
> above and the description C11 in mind. One thing I wanted to make clear
> was that a producer only needs to add the alignment if it is different
> from the default alignment as used for the language and abi. And that
> the
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 16:33 -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> Very interesting proposal! Thanks for putting it together.
Thanks. BTW part of the reason to propose this was the new gcc/gdb
expression support for C as recently posted to the gcc and gdb lists:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/
Hi Mark,
> I saw the submission deadline has officially passed, but I wanted to put
> up a formal proposal anyway. If not accepted to DWARF5 I will first
> implement it as a GNU extensions. But of course even in that case I
> would like feedback to make sure the extension is as close as possible
>
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 15:29 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Another thing added in C11 is the _Alignas specifier through which a
> user can request to have a type or object that is stricter than the
> default alignment for the type of object. Existing compilers like GCC
> already allow users to speci
