> On 25 Sep 2018, at 01:44, Cary Coutant wrote:
>
> The new material in Section 7.3.1 about what needs relocation is
> clarifying material that was just as true for DWARF 2, 3, and 4. That
> was an attempt to pre-emptively answer your questions above.
OK. Many thanks, all, for your clarificat
> I'm interested in the final state of an executable or shared object
> and I don't expect to find any remaining ELF-style (e.g.
> R_AMD64_64 and the like) run time (ld.so) relocations in non-loadable
> .debug_* sections.
No, you're not going to see any dynamic relocations for non-loadable
section
> On 24 Sep 2018, at 18:40, Eric Christopher wrote:
>
> Dwarf 5, 7.3.1
>
> "A DWARF expression may contain a DW_OP_addr (see Section 2.5.1.1 on 31 page
> 26) which contains a location within the virtual address space of the 32
> program, and require relocation."
I think I've confused the is
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:55 AM Michael Eager via Dwarf-Discuss <
dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org> wrote:
> On 09/24/2018 09:19 AM, Robert Harris via Dwarf-Discuss wrote:
> >> But in general, yes, any DWARF expression that contains a DW_OP_addr
> might need a relocation for its address argument.
On 09/24/2018 09:19 AM, Robert Harris via Dwarf-Discuss wrote:
But in general, yes, any DWARF expression that contains a DW_OP_addr might need
a relocation for its address argument.
>
Are you aware of where in the standard this is documented? It sounds reasonable
but I'm returning to this aft
Dwarf 5, 7.3.1
"A DWARF expression may contain a DW_OP_addr (see Section 2.5.1.1 on 31
page 26) which contains a location within the virtual address space of the
32 program, and require relocation."
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:35 AM Robert Harris via Dwarf-Discuss <
dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.or
> On 24 Sep 2018, at 16:59, Greg Clayton wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Sep 24, 2018, at 8:44 AM, Robert Harris
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 24 Sep 2018, at 15:33, Greg Clayton wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Sep 24, 2018, at 7:15 AM, Robert Harris via Dwarf-Discuss
wrote:
I'd like som
> On Sep 24, 2018, at 8:44 AM, Robert Harris wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 24 Sep 2018, at 15:33, Greg Clayton wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 24, 2018, at 7:15 AM, Robert Harris via Dwarf-Discuss
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd like some clarification regarding what precisely needs to be relocated
>>> relati
> On 24 Sep 2018, at 15:33, Greg Clayton wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Sep 24, 2018, at 7:15 AM, Robert Harris via Dwarf-Discuss
>> wrote:
>>
>> I'd like some clarification regarding what precisely needs to be relocated
>> relative to
>> the object load address when interpreting .debug_frame. I'm i
> On Sep 24, 2018, at 7:15 AM, Robert Harris via Dwarf-Discuss
> wrote:
>
> I'd like some clarification regarding what precisely needs to be relocated
> relative to
> the object load address when interpreting .debug_frame. I'm interested in
> versions
> 2, 3 and 4.
>
> I think the only exp
10 matches
Mail list logo
