ay, June 14, 2024 1:12 PM
> To: dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org; Robinson, Paul
> Subject: RE: [Dwarf-discuss] Request for clarification of handling
> stack-passed parameters
>
> In that case I shall create appropriate issues for the mentioned compilers in
> order to discuss the ma
iscuss@lists.dwarfstd.org>
Subject: [Dwarf-discuss] Request for clarification of handling stack-passed
parameters
# Request for clarification of handling stack-passed parameters
## Background
I came across this while parsing parameters of a variadic function in C. Formal
parameters are not s
would be evaluated in the
> context of the caller.
> --paulr
>
> From: Dwarf-discuss
> On Behalf
> Of Sergey via Dwarf-discuss
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 9:57 AM
> To: dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org
> Subject: [Dwarf-discuss] Request for clarification of handling stack-
the compiler to do that, the location description would be evaluated in the
context of the caller.
--paulr
From: Dwarf-discuss
On Behalf Of
Sergey via Dwarf-discuss
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 9:57 AM
To: dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org
Subject: [Dwarf-discuss] Request for clarification
# Request for clarification of handling stack-passed parameters
## Background
I came across this while parsing parameters of a variadic function in C. Formal
parameters are not sufficient for my case, since all the variadic arguments are
described with a single `DW_TAG_unspecified_parameters`,
