On Thu, Dec 01 2016, Michael Eager wrote:
> Andreas --
>
> Please submit comments about the Public Draft at
> http://dwarfstd.org/Comment.php.
OK, I've submitted three requests for clarifying separate aspects of the
DW_OP_piece and DW_OP_bit_piece operations.
--
Andreas
___
On 11/30/2016 05:24 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
BTW. It would be handy if there were sources for the spec so one can
create patches for simple typos. Also it is somewhat opaque how Issues
are handled. Could they and any comments from the committee be sent to
the mailinglist to make tracking changes
Andreas --
Please submit comments about the Public Draft at
http://dwarfstd.org/Comment.php.
On 12/01/2016 06:17 AM, Andreas Arnez wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01 2016, Mark Wielaard wrote:
BTW. It would be handy if there were sources for the spec so one can
create patches for simple typos. Also it is
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 13:52 +, Robinson, Paul wrote:
> Thanks for reporting this stuff! I see a few things you found have
> already been reported, but please make sure to file issues for the
> rest so we can clean up as much as we can.
Thanks, I did also file the following Issues, but they ha
On Thu, Dec 01 2016, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> BTW. It would be handy if there were sources for the spec so one can
> create patches for simple typos. Also it is somewhat opaque how Issues
> are handled. Could they and any comments from the committee be sent to
> the mailinglist to make tracking chan
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 01:52:47PM +, Robinson, Paul wrote:
> Thanks for reporting this stuff! I see a few things you found have
> already been reported, but please make sure to file issues for the
> rest so we can clean up as much as we can.
>
> > New FORMs. DW_FORM_ref_sup doesn't describe
Thanks for reporting this stuff! I see a few things you found have
already been reported, but please make sure to file issues for the
rest so we can clean up as much as we can.
> New FORMs. DW_FORM_ref_sup doesn't describe how the offset is
> represented. Currently the assumption in elfutils is t
>
> Enumeration types. It is allowed to have a DW_AT_byte_size on a
> DW_TAG_enumeration_type, but not DW_AT_encoding. To describe both size
> and encoding one needs to use a DW_AT_type pointing to a base type that
> represents the "underlying type". For languages where enumerations don't
> have a
I have been working on elfutils DWARFv5 support based on what GCC7
implements and the current public draft. I haven't had time to implement
everything. But since the public comment period was kept short I thought
it would be nice to at least document some of the things that I stumbled
over. Hopefu
