ping, in case anyone's got some ideas here
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:28 PM David Blaikie wrote:
> Ping?
>
> I did end up hacking around this by hashing in the DWO name into the CU
> hash if LLVM's producing more than one CU. It's not perfect (really it's
> more about the ThinLTO importing stage
Ping?
I did end up hacking around this by hashing in the DWO name into the CU
hash if LLVM's producing more than one CU. It's not perfect (really it's
more about the ThinLTO importing stage - normal LTO doesn't need this sort
of mangling) but suffices for now:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?r
some context:
1) A little while ago, I added the dwo_name to the dwo CU to improve
diagnostic quality on CU hash collisions in during a dwp action (previously
it could only report which input files (possibly other DWP files) contained
the duplicates/collision which could be very manual to track ba
