.
--paulr
> -Original Message-
> From: dwarf-discuss-boun...@lists.dwarfstd.org [mailto:dwarf-discuss-
> boun...@lists.dwarfstd.org] On Behalf Of Eric Christopher
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 3:57 PM
> To: Mark Wielaard
> Cc: DWARF
> Subject: Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Add fil
FWIW I fully agree with this line of reasoning. I was going to propose
it as well (though not as comperhensively) since we may decide that we
want to use something other than "the low 64-bits of an md5 hash" to
represent the file. Speaking of which, the particular hash and such
should be explicitly
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 08:32 -0700, Michael Eager wrote:
> I'll pass your comments on to the DWARF Committee.
Thanks. I also filed a comment for enhancement as proposal for DWARF5
now through http://dwarfstd.org/Comment.php to make sure the idea
doesn't get lost (and since the deadline for new DWAR
Hi Mark --
I'll pass your comments on to the DWARF Committee.
On 03/18/14 07:33, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
I was reading the suggestion for adding MD5 digests to the .debug_line
program header. http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=130701.1
Adding more attributes of files seems like a good t
Hi,
I was reading the suggestion for adding MD5 digests to the .debug_line
program header. http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=130701.1
Adding more attributes of files seems like a good thing, but as
specified this isn't extensible without changing the version number
again and defining new fo
