ng more sizes to the standard.
So I will not suggest any changes to the standard for this for now.
Tommy Hoffner
Compiler Backend Development
IBM Toronto Laboratory, 8200 Warden Ave, Markham, Ontario, Canada, L6G 1C7
Tel: 905-413-2036Tie: 313-2036Internet: thoff...@ca.ibm.com
John DelSignore
rpreted as a constant
I got the suggestion to use DW_FORM_sdata or DW_FORM_udata, since that will
make the part I'm having trouble with unambigious, but it feel strange,
since it isn't even obvious which encoding it the "right one" since signed
and unsigned doesn't rea
Seems like the mailing list cut my first attempt in half.
The standard way of encoding a constant value seems to be something like:
<2>< 196> DW_TAG_constant
DW_AT_name rans2
DW_AT_const_value 16
DW_AT_decl_file
The standard way of encoding a constant value seems to be something like:
<2>< 196> DW_TAG_constant
DW_AT_name rans2
DW_AT_const_value 16
DW_AT_decl_file 1
DW_AT_decl_line 0
