>
> Actually, for GCC and LLVM, the location is an *index* into vtable, *not*
> an offset. We have a compiler abstraction that knows how to convert the
> DWARF DW_AT_vtable_elem_location to our internal representation of a
> location, because various compilers generate the DWARF differently and the
On 4/23/25 22:46, Cary Coutant via Dwarf-discuss wrote:
Looking at the DWARF generated by GCC (and I'm guessing LLVM does the same), I
see vtable_elem_location attributes that look like this:
<1b8> DW_AT_vtable_elem_location: 2 byte block: 10 0 (DW_OP_constu: 0)
This is not correct DWARF!
