On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 4:56 PM David Anderson
wrote:
> On 1/13/25 11:31, David Blaikie wrote:
> > I still think the commentary on the indexes isn't quite right. They're
> > separate from this issue - you'd still need the rnglists base, or have
> > to assume that it's sizeof(header), to go that f
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 4:52 AM John DelSignore via Dwarf-discuss <
dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org> wrote:
> In-line below...
> On 1/13/25 20:10, David Anderson via Dwarf-discuss wrote:
>
> On 1/13/25 11:35, David Blaikie via Dwarf-discuss wrote:
>
> I guess Jon is referring to the 16th field i
--
Dwarf-discuss mailing list
Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org
https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss
John and all,
Well, a directory is a file, right? Ergo...
OTOH, you have a point about applicability. How about making a concrete
proposal?
DWARF is permissive in any case...
Ron
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 7:52 AM John DelSignore via Dwarf-discuss <
dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org> wrote:
> In
In-line below...
On 1/13/25 20:10, David Anderson via Dwarf-discuss wrote:
On 1/13/25 11:35, David Blaikie via Dwarf-discuss wrote:
I guess Jon is referring to the 16th field in the header, "directories
(sequence of directory names)" which uses the same encoding system (but
a separate format fiel
