On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 11:26 AM Ron Brender via Dwarf-discuss <
dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org> wrote:
> >The current DWARF 5 specification's statement in Section 2.17.3 (p. 53,
> line 15) that "Bounded range entries in a range list may not >overlap" is
> overly restrictive and doesn't reflect
>The current DWARF 5 specification's statement in Section 2.17.3 (p. 53,
line 15) that "Bounded range entries in a range list may not >overlap" is
overly restrictive and doesn't reflect valid cases where identical code
sequences are merged. The specification needs to >differentiate between
valid id
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 9:41 AM David Anderson via Dwarf-discuss <
dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org> wrote:
> On 12/11/24 16:59, Alex via Dwarf-discuss wrote:
> > ## Proposed Changes
> >
> > In Section 2.17 (Location Descriptions), replace the text on p. 53, line
> 15:
> >
> > From:
> > ```
> > Bo
On 12/11/24 16:59, Alex via Dwarf-discuss wrote:
## Proposed Changes
In Section 2.17 (Location Descriptions), replace the text on p. 53, line 15:
From:
```
Bounded range entries in a range list may not overlap. There is no
requirement that the entries be ordered in any particular way.
```
N
