Re: [Dwarf-discuss] Proposal: `DW_LNS_indirect_line`

2024-10-01 Thread Cary Coutant via Dwarf-discuss
The DWARF committee has voted to reject this proposal for DWARF 6. The committee felt that the cost of updating line numbers without the proposed indirection was not clearly shown to be unreasonable. We would be willing to reconsider the proposal at a later date if implementation experience shows

Re: [Dwarf-discuss] Coroutines

2024-10-01 Thread Adrian Prantl via Dwarf-discuss
CC'ing Felipe, who is currently reworking a lot of this code and is much deeper in the subject matter than me. -- adrian > On Oct 1, 2024, at 8:42 AM, Kyle Huey wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:02 AM Adrian Prantl wrote: >> LLDB implements this in a custom stepping plan that creates a co

Re: [Dwarf-discuss] Coroutines

2024-10-01 Thread Kyle Huey via Dwarf-discuss
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:02 AM Adrian Prantl wrote: > LLDB implements this in a custom stepping plan that creates a conditional > breakpoint where two async contexts are compared: First, there's the active > async context at the time of the step. Next, the active async context at the > time t