I think the type "T" found in the Dwarf info would have to have come from
> the same compile unit that the "normally declared" type "T" came from, i.e.
> your "DW_AT_name(...)" function would have to guarantee that. There's
> nothing stopping the same type name from being used in different ways in
Roman, For your given example:
T var1;
DW_AT_name(T) var2;
typeid(var1) == typeid (var2) ?
I think the type "T" found in the Dwarf info would have to have come from
the same compile unit that the "normally declared" type "T" came from, i.e.
your "DW_AT_name(...)" function would hav
