On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:27 PM Robinson, Paul
wrote:
> >> Well... why not just use ranges, in that case? .debug_rnglists is
> >> already tuned to reduce relocations. A range list with only one
> >> entry is the same as a contiguous range, and DW_RLE_offset_pair is
> >> basically the same as us
>> Well... why not just use ranges, in that case? .debug_rnglists is
>> already tuned to reduce relocations. A range list with only one
>> entry is the same as a contiguous range, and DW_RLE_offset_pair is
>> basically the same as using constant low_pc and high_pc.
>
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:56 PM Robinson, Paul
wrote:
> >> This discussion is about reducing the number of .debug_addr entries you
> >> need, so the place to look would be the "class address" attributes.
> >> There aren't all that many of them, and the one most likely to benefit
> >> would be DW
>> This discussion is about reducing the number of .debug_addr entries you
>> need, so the place to look would be the "class address" attributes.
>> There aren't all that many of them, and the one most likely to benefit
>> would be DW_AT_low_pc.
>>
>> We made it okay to have DW_AT_high_pc be a cons
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:00 PM Robinson, Paul
wrote:
> > From: Dwarf-Discuss [mailto:dwarf-discuss-boun...@lists.dwarfstd.org]
> On Behalf Of David Blaikie
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 11:04 AM
> > To: Doug Evans; dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org
> > Subject: Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] address p
> From: Dwarf-Discuss [mailto:dwarf-discuss-boun...@lists.dwarfstd.org] On
> Behalf Of David Blaikie
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 11:04 AM
> To: Doug Evans; dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org
> Subject: Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] address pool + offset representation
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:51
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:51 AM Doug Evans wrote:
> How about a new form that specifies two things: index in .debug_addr +
> offset, where index and offset are any current constant representation
> (fixed size or leb) ?
>
Roughly what I had in mind - but wasn't sure how to encode that.
Would t
